This paper establishes that particle ontology is logically unnecessary in fundamental physics. The dimensionless invariant ξ ≡ μα — product of the proton-to-electron mass ratio μ and the fine-structure constant α — cancels all particle-ontological prerequisites through dependence annihilation, yielding a purely spectral quantity. While μ and α individually presuppose particle ontology, their product ξ² = (μα) ² resides in the kernel of the scale-valuation map, constituting the unique minimal generator of scale-invariant spectral observables of M₃ (ℂ). This is not a numerical coincidence but a structural consequence of axioms A1 (non-commutativity) and A2 (metric completeness). The natural variable ξ² admits a closed-form six-term expansion derived exclusively from axioms A1–A3 of Cognitional Mechanics, with zero free parameters. The numerical value ξ² = 179. 5347. . . agrees with experiment to within 1. 73×10⁻¹³ (relative). Once ξ² is constructively realized from the algebra, retaining particle taxonomy as a primitive becomes structurally untenable: the declaration of phlogiston-equivalence is a logical necessity imposed by the algebra itself, not a philosophical preference. All gauge-invariant observables of the Standard Model reduce to spectral data of Spec (D) on the algebra AF = M₃ (ℂ) ⊕ ℂ. The surjective map ℰ: Sₛpec → TSM and the Reconstruction Lemma establish that ξ² is a complete gauge-invariant statistic for the observational content of the Standard Model. Asymptotic freedom, DGLAP phenomenology, and three-generation structure are accounted for as Tier-2 projections of M₃ (ℂ) without particle ontology. Particle ontology satisfies all three phlogiston-equivalence criteria and is structurally redundant.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
T.O.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
T.O. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefd9bfede9185760d453d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19753338
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: