TAVI showed broadly comparable cost-effectiveness to MICS-AVR in low-risk severe aortic stenosis, depending strongly on institutional performance and surgical expertise.
Does TAVI improve cost-effectiveness compared to MICS-AVR in low-risk patients with isolated severe AS?
Low-risk patients with isolated severe aortic stenosis (AS)
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)
Minimally Invasive Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (MICS-AVR)
Cost-effectiveness
TAVI and MICS-AVR offer comparable cost-effectiveness for low-risk severe AS in Japan, though institutional expertise heavily influences the economic value.
TAVI and MICS-AVR showed broadly comparable cost-effectiveness in low-risk patients with isolated severe AS. The relative economic value of TAVI depended strongly on institutional performance and surgical expertise.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kawakami et al. (Wed,) reported a other. TAVI showed broadly comparable cost-effectiveness to MICS-AVR in low-risk severe aortic stenosis, depending strongly on institutional performance and surgical expertise.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69f04d9f727298f751e71efa — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2026.03.008
Hiroshi Kawakami
Taisuke Nakayama
Ryo Miyabe
JACC Asia
Ehime University
Chiba-Nishi General Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...