Teach-back method-based continuing nursing significantly improved self-management behaviors (P<0.001) and reduced 30-day readmission rates (6.67% vs. 17.14%, P=0.016) in postoperative AD patients.
Does teach-back method-based continuing nursing improve self-management behavior and quality of life in patients after aortic dissection surgery?
210 postoperative aortic dissection (AD) patients at a tertiary hospital in Nanchang, China
Teach-back method-based continuing nursing
Routine care
Self-management behavior assessed by the Self-Management Assessment Scale (SMAS) and Quality of Life (QoL) measured by the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) at baseline, discharge, 1-month, and 6-month follow-uppatient reported
Teach-back method-based continuing nursing significantly improves self-management behaviors, quality of life, and reduces adverse clinical outcomes in postoperative aortic dissection patients.
BACKGROUND: Aortic dissection (AD) is a life-threatening cardiovascular emergency with declining postoperative quality of life (QoL). The teach-back method has shown effectiveness in chronic disease management, but its application in postoperative AD patients remains unexplored. METHODS: This quasi-experimental study with ward-level cluster allocation enrolled 210 AD patients (105 per group) at a tertiary hospital in Nanchang, China, from January 2023 to June 2024. The experimental group received teach-back method-based continuing nursing, while the control group received routine care. Primary outcomes included self-management behavior assessed by the Self-Management Assessment Scale (SMAS) and QoL measured by the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) at baseline, discharge, 1-month, and 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes comprised health knowledge scores at baseline and 1-month post-discharge, and adverse clinical outcomes including 30-day unplanned readmission rates, 6-month AD recurrence rates, and total adverse events. RESULTS: The experimental group demonstrated significantly higher SMAS across all dimensions with a significant time×group interaction (P < 0.001). Disease knowledge questionnaire score at 1-month was significantly higher in the experimental group (21.36 ± 2.89 vs. 15.82 ± 3.54, P < 0.001). Both PCS and MCS scores showed significant improvements over time (both P < 0.001), with the experimental group achieving higher scores than the control group at all follow-up time points (all P < 0.001). A significant time×group interaction effect was observed for MCS (P = 0.0052) but not for PCS (P = 0.599). The experimental group achieved significantly better blood pressure control at 6 months (SBP: 125.6 ± 10.8 vs. 133.4 ± 14.8 mmHg, P < 0.001). The experimental group had lower 30-day readmission rates (6.67% vs. 17.14%, P = 0.016), 6-month AD recurrence rates (4.76% vs. 14.29%, P = 0.014), and total adverse events (4.76% vs. 12.38%, P = 0.048). Follow-up completion rates exceeded 93% at all time points. CONCLUSION: Teach-back method-based continuing nursing significantly improved self-management behaviors, QoL, and reduced adverse outcomes in postoperative AD patients, warranting integration into routine discharge protocols.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Huang et al. (Thu,) conducted a other in postoperative aortic dissection (n=210). teach-back method-based continuing nursing vs. routine care was evaluated on self-management behavior (SMAS) and QoL (PCS and MCS of SF-36) (p=<0.001). Teach-back method-based continuing nursing significantly improved self-management behaviors (P<0.001) and reduced 30-day readmission rates (6.67% vs. 17.14%, P=0.016) in postoperative AD patients.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69f6e6ab8071d4f1bdfc75cc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-026-04198-3
Qiuxia Huang
Liqing Huang
Jianying Xiong
Nanchang University
First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...