Abstract This paper explains why Islamabad's master plan, intended for periodic revision, has remained in effect for six decades and how this permanence has shaped the city's sociospatial inequality. The analysis combines archival materials from the 1959 Yahya Khan Commission and Doxiadis Associates, Capital Development Authority files on review efforts (1972, 1986, 2005), court decisions, census indicators and published GIS evidence (1998–2023), and oral history interviews with officials. The findings show that comprehensive revision was repeatedly blocked not by inertia but by institutional lock‐in: zoning stability, judicialisation of planning and coalition resistance among state actors and land interests. These dynamics channelled growth into selective exceptions and managed informality, producing durable sociospatial differentiation in the region. This paper expands debates in economic and social geography on path dependence and urban governance in contemporary post‐colonial cities.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nafees Ahmad
Guoqiang Shen
Junaid Aḥmad
Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie
Zhejiang University
University of Macau
City University of Macau
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ahmad et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69f6e6e68071d4f1bdfc783e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.70084
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: