Abstract Government guidance published during the COVID-19 pandemic implied that employers owe a duty to protect their employees from the risk of infectious disease in the workplace. That employers owe a duty in respect of occupational disease – including occupational infectious disease – is well established. However, there is no authority to support the proposition that the employer’s duty extends to include infectious diseases in general circulation in the community (e.g. COVID-19, flu, measles). The Government’s guidance was therefore based on a misunderstanding of employers’ liability. This article argues that infectious diseases in general circulation are, and should remain, beyond the scope of the employer’s duty in English law.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
John Bridge Fanning
The Cambridge Law Journal
University of Liverpool
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
John Bridge Fanning (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fada7f03f892aec9b1e52a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197326101470