BACKGROUND: Tobacco endgame strategies aim to reduce smoking prevalence to minimal levels (15%, and practical guidance on how to assess readiness for endgame implementation remains limited. This study aims to synthetise the key determinants of jurisdictions' readiness for tobacco endgame and proposes a self-assessment tool to evaluate it. METHODS: A narrative review of peer-reviewed and grey literature published between January 2010 and September 2025 was conducted. Publications were identified through targeted searches of academic databases and relevant organisational websites. A thematic synthesis of evidence on political, social and structural determinants of readiness was undertaken to identify recurring domains, which were later used to inform the development of a self-assessment tool. RESULTS: Nine readiness domains were identified: relatively low smoking prevalence; advanced implementation of WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control measures; robust enforcement infrastructure; social denormalisation of smoking; broad public understanding and support for ending tobacco use; a positive political climate and strong political will and leadership; a cohesive tobacco control community and civil society; minimal tobacco industry interference with strong protective mechanisms; and sufficient resources to implement tobacco endgame action plan. These domains guided the development of an evidence-informed self-assessment tool to help jurisdictions evaluate readiness, identify gaps and prioritise strategic actions. CONCLUSION: The Assessment of Readiness for Tobacco Endgame tool offers an evidence-informed framework to assess tobacco endgame readiness, helping jurisdictions assess capacities, identify gaps and guide strategic decision-making.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ariadna Feliu
Cristina Martínez
Constantine Vardavas
Tobacco Control
University of California, San Francisco
Imperial College London
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Feliu et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbe3aa164b5133a91a2e4e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2025-059920