The study examined geography teachers’ perspectives on integrating controversial topics into the curriculum. Teachers were asked to write essays on why they should not fear addressing political and value-based issues in their lessons. The research found that most teachers agreed on the benefits of discussing controversial issues, such as fostering critical thinking and emotional management, while emphasizing the use of reliable information. However, opinions differed on whether teachers should share their personal views during these discussions, with some advocating for neutrality. The study highlighted two primary barriers: the significant time needed for preparation and the lack of methodological support. Teachers also expressed concerns about potential conflicts with colleagues, parents or school administration, which contribute to their reluctance to engage in such discussions. Despite these challenges, there was a consensus that controversial issues should be included in geography education to better prepare students for the complex real-world problems they will face.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Štefan Karolčík
Elena Čipková
Kristina Huszárová
Journal of Human Values
Comenius University Bratislava
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Karolčík et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7e23bfa21ec5bbf0656e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09716858261446242
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: