Implementing point-of-care CYP2C19 genetic testing in an acute stroke unit was feasible, with a 0.17% test failure rate and identifying 32.5% of patients as clopidogrel non-responders.
Observational
No
Does point-of-care CYP2C19 genetic testing optimize antiplatelet prescription in patients with suspected stroke or TIA?
586 patients presenting with suspected stroke or Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA) at an NHS Hyperacute Stroke Unit (HASU)
Point of care (POC) CYP2C19 genetic testing
Feasibility and operational metrics of POC testing (test failure rate, time for test completion, proportion of clopidogrel non-responders, and rate of genetically guided antiplatelet therapy prescription)
Implementation of point-of-care CYP2C19 genetic testing in an acute stroke unit is feasible, scalable, and effectively facilitates immediate, personalized antiplatelet prescribing.
Abstract Background and aims Clopidogrel is a commonly used antiplatelet medication recommended for secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke and Transient ischaemic attack (TIA). As it is a prodrug, it requires hepatic biotransformation by CYP2C19. Approximately 27-57 % of the population have reduced CYP2C19 activity making clopidogrel less effective for secondary prevention. As such, NICE now recommends CYP2C19 genotype testing to assess if clopidogrel is suitable in patients with recent stroke or TIA. We present the experience of implementing point of care (POC) CYP2C19 genetic testing at an NHS Hyperacute Stroke Unit (HASU). Methods Testing was introduced at the Stroke front door over 12 hours 7 days/week for patients presenting with suspected stroke or TIA by training a cohort of six stroke assessment nurses and five HCAs. Scaling up to include patients presenting outside these hours and inpatients was achieved by sequentially training HASU nurses and HCAs. Analysis was performed on 586 patients tested between 17th March and 25thJuly 2025. Results The POC system showed good reliability with test failure rate 0.17%. Time for test completion was 64-76 minutes. Approximately, one-third of the patients (32.5%) were clopidogrel non-responders including (28.5%) with recurrent stroke. Crucially, in most of the clopidogrel non-responders (83.7%) an immediate genetically guided antiplatelet therapy was prescribed. The proportion of tests undertaken where antiplatelet prescription was not indicated was low (11.2%). Conclusions Implementation of POC testing was feasible, scalable and effective in providing immediate availability of results. It has the potential to reduce recurrent ischaemic events by ensuring tailored and personalised antiplatelet prescription in acute settings. Conflict of interest This work was supported by the Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Innovate UK (DEVOTE 10058536). JM is supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) as an Academic Clinical Lecturer; the Manchester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre BRC (NIHR 203956). All authors are supported by the NHS England Genomics Programme through the Pharmacogenetics and Medicines Optimisation Network of Excellence.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nourhan Soliman
Dwaipayan Sen
Craig Smith
European Stroke Journal
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
Salford Royal Hospital
St Mary's Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Soliman et al. (Fri,) conducted a observational in Suspected stroke or TIA (n=586). Point of care (POC) CYP2C19 genetic testing was evaluated on Test failure rate. Implementing point-of-care CYP2C19 genetic testing in an acute stroke unit was feasible, with a 0.17% test failure rate and identifying 32.5% of patients as clopidogrel non-responders.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7ec6bfa21ec5bbf07117 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.329
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: