Does optimal AV and VV timing differ between LBBAP, LOT-CRT, and BVP in CRT-indicated patients?
48 CRT-indicated patients
Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) and LBBAP optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (LOT-CRT) with varying AV and VV delays
Biventricular pacing (BVP) with varying AV and VV delays (paired comparison)
Optimal AV and VV timing determined by acute measurements of LV dP/dtmax and QRS durationsurrogate
Optimal AV delay for LBBAP is shorter than for LOT-CRT or BVP based on hemodynamics, and patient-specific AV delays based on intrinsic conduction improve AV selection.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The study aimed to determine optimal AV timing for left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) and optimal AV and VV timing for LBBAP optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (LOT-CRT), to enhance the benefit of conduction system pacing. METHODS: Acute measurements of LV dP/dtmax and QRS duration were collected during sweeps of AV and VV delays during paired comparison of LBBAP, LOT-CRT, and biventricular pacing (BVP), in 48 CRT-indicated patients. Optimal AV delays were selected as the vertex of a parabolic model fit to the AV sweep results, obtained independently for LV dP/dtmax and QRS duration. RESULTS: LBBAP, LOT-CRT, and BVP were similarly sensitive to the choice of AV delay, and 60ms deviations from optimal AV delay resulted in an approximately 30% reduction in the hemodynamic benefits of resynchronization. Based upon LV dP/dtmax measurements, the average optimal paced AV (PAV) for LBBAP (152ms) was significantly shorter than that for LOT-CRT (171ms, p < 0.01) or BVP (167ms, p = 0.01). Based upon QRS duration, the average optimal PAV for LBBAP (164ms) was similar to that for LOT-CRT (160ms, p = 0.52) or BVP (165ms, p = 0.95). For each resynchronization modality, a linear regression between the patient's measured intrinsic AV conduction and their optimal AV delay provided a patient-specific AV delay, resulting in improved AV selection compared to applying a fixed AV delay to all patients. Finally, simultaneous activation (VV = 0) was best for both LOT-CRT and BVP. CONCLUSION: LBBAP, LOT-CRT, and BVP are similarly sensitive to AV-timing. Optimal AV delay is linearly related to intrinsic AV for each resynchronization modality. For LOT-CRT and BVP, simultaneous biventricular activation is best on average.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Robert D Schaller
Paul Foley
Badrinathan Chandrasekaran
EP Europace
University of Chicago
Imperial College London
Vanderbilt University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Schaller et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7f3abfa21ec5bbf07a8a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euag103