Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Stablecoins have burst onto the scene, offering the potential for cheaper, faster, and smarter payments—perhaps even strengthened dollar dominance. Yet, for all the novel technology, stablecoins present a host of age-old risks that caution against such boosterism. This paper draws parallels to nineteenth-century monetary history, focusing on the chaotic free banking era (1837–1863) and the more stable national banking era (1864–1913), and finds that the current regime under the GENIUS Act is closer to the former than the latter. The paper also considers additional risks that could undermine trust in stablecoins, including illicit finance and corruption.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
HARRIS et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a080a11a487c87a6a40be4e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20261040
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
M HARRIS
Kenneth Rogoff
AEA Papers and Proceedings
University of Pennsylvania
Harvard University Press
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...